▶ 調査レポート

世界のロードバランサー市場(~2027):コンポーネント別、種類別、組織規模別、サービス別、展開種類別、産業別、地域別

• 英文タイトル:Load Balancer Market Research Report by Component, Load Balancer Type, Organization Size, Service, Deployment Type, Vertical, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

360iResearchが調査・発行した産業分析レポートです。世界のロードバランサー市場(~2027):コンポーネント別、種類別、組織規模別、サービス別、展開種類別、産業別、地域別 / Load Balancer Market Research Report by Component, Load Balancer Type, Organization Size, Service, Deployment Type, Vertical, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19 / 360iR22NM053資料のイメージです。• レポートコード:360iR22NM053
• 出版社/出版日:360iResearch / 2022年10月
• レポート形態:英語、PDF、257ページ
• 納品方法:Eメール(受注後2-3日)
• 産業分類:産業装置
• 販売価格(消費税別)
  Single User(1名利用、印刷可)¥732,452 (USD4,949)▷ お問い合わせ
  Enterprise License(企業利用、印刷可)¥1,472,452 (USD9,949)▷ お問い合わせ
• ご注文方法:お問い合わせフォーム記入又はEメールでご連絡ください。
• お支払方法:銀行振込(納品後、ご請求書送付)
レポート概要
360iResearch社の本リサーチレポートによると、2021年に3,854.37百万ドルであった世界のロードバランサー市場規模が、2022年に4,523.03百万ドルになり、2027年まで年平均17.52%で成長して10,156.47百万ドルに達する見通しです。本レポートでは、ロードバランサーの世界市場について調査し、序論、調査方法、エグゼクティブサマリー、市場概要、市場インサイト、コンポーネント別(ハードウェア、サービス、ソフトウエア)分析、種類別(グローバルロードバランサー、ローカルロードバランサー)分析、組織規模別(大企業、中小企業)分析、産業別(金融、エネルギー、政府・公共機関、医療・ライフサイエンス、IT・通信)分析、地域別(南北アメリカ、アメリカ、カナダ、ブラジル、アジア太平洋、日本、中国、インド、韓国、台湾、ヨーロッパ/中東/アフリカ、イギリス、ドイツ、フランス、ロシア、その他)分析、競争状況、企業情報などを整理しています。本書に記載されている企業情報としては、A1o Networks、Array Networks、Avanu、Avi Networks、AWS、Barracuda Networks、CItrix Systems、Cloudflare、Dialogic、F5 Networks、Fastly、Fortinet、Google、HPE、IBM、Impervaなどが含まれています。
・序論
・調査方法
・エグゼクティブサマリー
・市場概要
・市場インサイト

・世界のロードバランサー市場規模:コンポーネント別
- ロードバランサーハードウェアの市場規模
- ロードバランサーサービスの市場規模
- ロードバランサーソフトウエアの市場規模

・世界のロードバランサー市場規模:種類別
- グローバルロードバランサーの市場規模
- ローカルロードバランサーの市場規模

・世界のロードバランサー市場規模:組織規模別
- 大企業における市場規模
- 中小企業における市場規模

・世界のロードバランサー市場規模:産業別
- 金融における市場規模
- エネルギーにおける市場規模
- 政府・公共機関における市場規模
- 医療・ライフサイエンスにおける市場規模
- IT・通信における市場規模

・世界のロードバランサー市場規模:地域別
- 南北アメリカのロードバランサー市場規模
アメリカのロードバランサー市場規模
カナダのロードバランサー市場規模
ブラジルのロードバランサー市場規模

- アジア太平洋のロードバランサー市場規模
日本のロードバランサー市場規模
中国のロードバランサー市場規模
インドのロードバランサー市場規模
韓国のロードバランサー市場規模
台湾のロードバランサー市場規模

- ヨーロッパ/中東/アフリカのロードバランサー市場規模
イギリスのロードバランサー市場規模
ドイツのロードバランサー市場規模
フランスのロードバランサー市場規模
ロシアのロードバランサー市場規模

- その他地域のロードバランサー市場規模

・競争状況
・企業情報

The Global Load Balancer Market size was estimated at USD 3,854.37 million in 2021 and expected to reach USD 4,523.03 million in 2022, and is projected to grow at a CAGR 17.52% to reach USD 10,156.47 million by 2027.

Market Statistics:
The report provides market sizing and forecast across 7 major currencies – USD, EUR, JPY, GBP, AUD, CAD, and CHF. It helps organization leaders make better decisions when currency exchange data is readily available. In this report, the years 2018 and 2020 are considered as historical years, 2021 as the base year, 2022 as the estimated year, and years from 2023 to 2027 are considered as the forecast period.

Market Segmentation & Coverage:
This research report categorizes the Load Balancer to forecast the revenues and analyze the trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Based on Component, the market was studied across Hardware, Services, and Software.

Based on Load Balancer Type, the market was studied across Global Load Balancers and Local Load Balancer.

Based on Organization Size, the market was studied across Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.

Based on Service, the market was studied across Integration and Deployment, Support and Maintenance, and Training and Consulting.

Based on Deployment Type, the market was studied across Cloud and On-Premises.

Based on Vertical, the market was studied across Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance, Energy, Government and Public Sector, Healthcare and Life Sciences, IT and Telecom, Manufacturing, Media and Entertainment, and Retail.

Based on Region, the market was studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Cumulative Impact of COVID-19:
COVID-19 is an incomparable global public health emergency that has affected almost every industry, and the long-term effects are projected to impact the industry growth during the forecast period. Our ongoing research amplifies our research framework to ensure the inclusion of underlying COVID-19 issues and potential paths forward. The report delivers insights on COVID-19 considering the changes in consumer behavior and demand, purchasing patterns, re-routing of the supply chain, dynamics of current market forces, and the significant interventions of governments. The updated study provides insights, analysis, estimations, and forecasts, considering the COVID-19 impact on the market.

Cumulative Impact of 2022 Russia Ukraine Conflict:
We continuously monitor and update reports on political and economic uncertainty due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Negative impacts are significantly foreseen globally, especially across Eastern Europe, European Union, Eastern & Central Asia, and the United States. This contention has severely affected lives and livelihoods and represents far-reaching disruptions in trade dynamics. The potential effects of ongoing war and uncertainty in Eastern Europe are expected to have an adverse impact on the world economy, with especially long-term harsh effects on Russia.This report uncovers the impact of demand & supply, pricing variants, strategic uptake of vendors, and recommendations for Load Balancer market considering the current update on the conflict and its global response.

Competitive Strategic Window:
The Competitive Strategic Window analyses the competitive landscape in terms of markets, applications, and geographies to help the vendor define an alignment or fit between their capabilities and opportunities for future growth prospects. It describes the optimal or favorable fit for the vendors to adopt successive merger and acquisition strategies, geography expansion, research & development, and new product introduction strategies to execute further business expansion and growth during a forecast period.

FPNV Positioning Matrix:
The FPNV Positioning Matrix evaluates and categorizes the vendors in the Load Balancer Market based on Business Strategy (Business Growth, Industry Coverage, Financial Viability, and Channel Support) and Product Satisfaction (Value for Money, Ease of Use, Product Features, and Customer Support) that aids businesses in better decision making and understanding the competitive landscape.

Market Share Analysis:
The Market Share Analysis offers the analysis of vendors considering their contribution to the overall market. It provides the idea of its revenue generation into the overall market compared to other vendors in the space. It provides insights into how vendors are performing in terms of revenue generation and customer base compared to others. Knowing market share offers an idea of the size and competitiveness of the vendors for the base year. It reveals the market characteristics in terms of accumulation, fragmentation, dominance, and amalgamation traits.

Competitive Scenario:
The Competitive Scenario provides an outlook analysis of the various business growth strategies adopted by the vendors. The news covered in this section deliver valuable thoughts at the different stage while keeping up-to-date with the business and engage stakeholders in the economic debate. The competitive scenario represents press releases or news of the companies categorized into Merger & Acquisition, Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership, New Product Launch & Enhancement, Investment & Funding, and Award, Recognition, & Expansion. All the news collected help vendor to understand the gaps in the marketplace and competitor’s strength and weakness thereby, providing insights to enhance product and service.

Company Usability Profiles:
The report profoundly explores the recent significant developments by the leading vendors and innovation profiles in the Global Load Balancer Market, including A1o Networks, Array Networks, Avanu, Avi Networks, AWS, Barracuda Networks, CItrix Systems, Cloudflare, Dialogic, F5 Networks, Fastly, Fortinet, Google, HPE, IBM, Imperva, Inlab Software, Joyent, Kemp Technologies, Loadbalancer.Org, Microsoft, NGINX, Radware, Riverbed Technology, and Zevenet.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:
1. Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the key players
2. Market Development: Provides in-depth information about lucrative emerging markets and analyze penetration across mature segments of the markets
3. Market Diversification: Provides detailed information about new product launches, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certification, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players
5. Product Development & Innovation: Provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments

The report answers questions such as:
1. What is the market size and forecast of the Global Load Balancer Market?
2. What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 shaping the Global Load Balancer Market during the forecast period?
3. Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the forecast period in the Global Load Balancer Market?
4. What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Load Balancer Market?
5. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Load Balancer Market?
6. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Global Load Balancer Market?
7. What modes and strategic moves are considered suitable for entering the Global Load Balancer Market?

レポート目次

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Limitations
1.7. Assumptions
1.8. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology
2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights
5.1. Market Dynamics
5.1.1. Drivers
5.1.1.1. Increased awareness among enterprises about the advantages of the cloud
5.1.1.2. Government initiatives for new investments in digital transformation
5.1.1.3. Rising adoption of cloud-based load balancing services, data center traffic, and server virtualization
5.1.2. Restraints
5.1.2.1. Lack of high bandwidth providers and access to high-speed internet
5.1.3. Opportunities
5.1.3.1. Development of IoT, AI, and software-defined networking technologies
5.1.3.2. Rapid growth in the Internet Protocol traffic and cloud traffic
5.1.4. Challenges
5.1.4.1. Difficulty in implementing the latest load balancer modules in existing networking ecosystems
5.2. Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

6. Load Balancer Market, by Component
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Hardware
6.3. Services
6.4. Software

7. Load Balancer Market, by Load Balancer Type
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Global Load Balancers
7.3. Local Load Balancer

8. Load Balancer Market, by Organization Size
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Large Enterprises
8.3. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

9. Load Balancer Market, by Service
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Integration and Deployment
9.3. Support and Maintenance
9.4. Training and Consulting

10. Load Balancer Market, by Deployment Type
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Cloud
10.3. On-Premises

11. Load Balancer Market, by Vertical
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance
11.3. Energy
11.4. Government and Public Sector
11.5. Healthcare and Life Sciences
11.6. IT and Telecom
11.7. Manufacturing
11.8. Media and Entertainment
11.9. Retail

12. Americas Load Balancer Market
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Argentina
12.3. Brazil
12.4. Canada
12.5. Mexico
12.6. United States

13. Asia-Pacific Load Balancer Market
13.1. Introduction
13.2. Australia
13.3. China
13.4. India
13.5. Indonesia
13.6. Japan
13.7. Malaysia
13.8. Philippines
13.9. Singapore
13.10. South Korea
13.11. Taiwan
13.12. Thailand
13.13. Vietnam

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Load Balancer Market
14.1. Introduction
14.2. Denmark
14.3. Egypt
14.4. Finland
14.5. France
14.6. Germany
14.7. Israel
14.8. Italy
14.9. Netherlands
14.10. Nigeria
14.11. Norway
14.12. Poland
14.13. Qatar
14.14. Russia
14.15. Saudi Arabia
14.16. South Africa
14.17. Spain
14.18. Sweden
14.19. Switzerland
14.20. Turkey
14.21. United Arab Emirates
14.22. United Kingdom

15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. FPNV Positioning Matrix
15.1.1. Quadrants
15.1.2. Business Strategy
15.1.3. Product Satisfaction
15.2. Market Ranking Analysis, By Key Player
15.3. Market Share Analysis, By Key Player
15.4. Competitive Scenario
15.4.1. Merger & Acquisition
15.4.2. Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership
15.4.3. New Product Launch & Enhancement
15.4.4. Investment & Funding
15.4.5. Award, Recognition, & Expansion

16. Company Usability Profiles
16.1. A1o Networks
16.1.1. Business Overview
16.1.2. Key Executives
16.1.3. Product & Services
16.2. Array Networks
16.2.1. Business Overview
16.2.2. Key Executives
16.2.3. Product & Services
16.3. Avanu
16.3.1. Business Overview
16.3.2. Key Executives
16.3.3. Product & Services
16.4. Avi Networks
16.4.1. Business Overview
16.4.2. Key Executives
16.4.3. Product & Services
16.5. AWS
16.5.1. Business Overview
16.5.2. Key Executives
16.5.3. Product & Services
16.6. Barracuda Networks
16.6.1. Business Overview
16.6.2. Key Executives
16.6.3. Product & Services
16.7. CItrix Systems
16.7.1. Business Overview
16.7.2. Key Executives
16.7.3. Product & Services
16.8. Cloudflare
16.8.1. Business Overview
16.8.2. Key Executives
16.8.3. Product & Services
16.9. Dialogic
16.9.1. Business Overview
16.9.2. Key Executives
16.9.3. Product & Services
16.10. F5 Networks
16.10.1. Business Overview
16.10.2. Key Executives
16.10.3. Product & Services
16.11. Fastly
16.11.1. Business Overview
16.11.2. Key Executives
16.11.3. Product & Services
16.12. Fortinet
16.12.1. Business Overview
16.12.2. Key Executives
16.12.3. Product & Services
16.13. Google
16.13.1. Business Overview
16.13.2. Key Executives
16.13.3. Product & Services
16.14. HPE
16.14.1. Business Overview
16.14.2. Key Executives
16.14.3. Product & Services
16.15. IBM
16.15.1. Business Overview
16.15.2. Key Executives
16.15.3. Product & Services
16.16. Imperva
16.16.1. Business Overview
16.16.2. Key Executives
16.16.3. Product & Services
16.17. Inlab Software
16.17.1. Business Overview
16.17.2. Key Executives
16.17.3. Product & Services
16.18. Joyent
16.18.1. Business Overview
16.18.2. Key Executives
16.18.3. Product & Services
16.19. Kemp Technologies
16.19.1. Business Overview
16.19.2. Key Executives
16.19.3. Product & Services
16.20. Loadbalancer.Org
16.20.1. Business Overview
16.20.2. Key Executives
16.20.3. Product & Services
16.21. Microsoft
16.21.1. Business Overview
16.21.2. Key Executives
16.21.3. Product & Services
16.22. NGINX
16.22.1. Business Overview
16.22.2. Key Executives
16.22.3. Product & Services
16.23. Radware
16.23.1. Business Overview
16.23.2. Key Executives
16.23.3. Product & Services
16.24. Riverbed Technology
16.24.1. Business Overview
16.24.2. Key Executives
16.24.3. Product & Services
16.25. Zevenet
16.25.1. Business Overview
16.25.2. Key Executives
16.25.3. Product & Services

17. Appendix
17.1. Discussion Guide
17.2. License & Pricing